Maternal age risk factor on fetal prenatal diagnosis

Authors

Keywords:

Chromosome aberrations, fetal aneuploidy, Chromosome analysis, cytogenetic prenatal diagnosis, chromosomal risk factors.

Abstract

Introduction: Advanced maternal age has been acknowledged as a risk factor for fetal aneuploidies. Among other factors the following are described: ultrasonography findings, family records for chromosomal aberrations and a previously affected child.

Objective: To estimate the frequency of fetal chromosomal abnormalities according to advanced maternal age and others risk factors.

Methods: A descriptive transversal study was performed using 1817 karyotypes from prenatal analysis in amniotic fluids in the period 2017-2018 in the National Medical Genetics Center from Cuba.

Results: Frequency of fetal chromosomal abnormalities was 3.19%. Trisomy 21 and 47,XXY syndrome were more frequent in advanced maternal age pregnant women but not for trisomies 13, 18, 47,XYY, 47,XXX, 45,X syndrome or structural chromosome anomalies.Advanced maternal age factor associated with positive ultrasound, and ultrasound findings solely reached a chromosomal aberration index of 4,23% and 4,22%;and advanced maternal age and advanced paternal age separately 3.30% y 3.33% each one.

Conclusions: Fetal chromosome abnormalities frequency was similar in mothers below and above 35-year-old age. Advanced maternal age pregnant women showed an increased risk for trisomy 21 and 47,XXY syndrome. An increased risk for trisomies 13, 18, 47,XYY, 47,XXX, 45,X syndrome or structural chromosome anomalies was not confirmed. A positive ultrasound in combination with advanced maternal age and positive ultrasound solely were the main factors for fetal chromosomal risk. The predictive value of advanced maternal age solely was confirmed to be the main third index in fetal aneuploidies in cytogenetic prenatal diagnosis.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Damarys García Gómez, Centro Nacional de Genética Médica de Cuba. La Habana

Dra en Medicina. Especiliasta en Genética Clínica. Profesor Asistente.  Investigador Agregado Citogenetista del Laboratorio de  citogenética del CNGM, desde 2004. Realiza diagnóstico cromosómico prenatal y postanatal a los pacientes de riesgos para estas enfermedades. Realiza la asistencia Médica para deteccios de enfermedades genética en el Instituo de  Oftalmología.

References

1. Nussbaum RL, McInnes RR, Willard HF. Thompson & Thompson genetics in medicine e-book: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2015.

2. Sherman SL, Allen EG, Bean LH, Freeman SB. Epidemiology of Down syndrome. mrdd [en línea] 2007 [fecha de acceso 11 de enero de 2019] 13(3):[221-7].URLDisponible en: https://www.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/mrdd.20157

3. Practice bulletin No. 163: screening for fetal aneuploidy. Obstet Gynecol. [en línea] 2016 [fecha de acceso 16 de diciembre de 2018] 13(3):[221-7].URL Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27101120.

4. Bianchi DW. Fetology: diagnosis and management of the fetal patient. 2nd. New York: McGraw-Hill Medical Publication Division; 2010.

5. Méndez Rosado LA, Hechavarría Estenoz D, de la Torre ME, Pimentel Benitez H, Hernández-Gil J, B Perez, Barrios Martínez A.Current status of prenatal diagnosis in Cuba: causes of low prevalence of Down syndrome . Prenat Diagn [en línea] 2016 jun 20[fecha de acceso 18 de diciembre de 2018] 127(5):979–981. URL Disponible en https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/pd.4421.

6. Marcheco B. El Programa Nacional de Diagnóstico, Manejo y Prevención de Enfermedades Genéticas y Defectos Congénitos de Cuba: 1981-2009 RevCubanaGenetComunit. [en línea] 2009. [fecha de acceso 20 de febrero de 2019]: 3(2,3) URL Disponible en:http://bvs.sld.cu/revistas/rcgc/v3n2_3/cuba.pdf.

7. Barch, M. J, Knutsen, T, Spurbeck, J. L, & Association of Genetic Technologists. (1997). The AGT cytogenetics laboratory manual. Philadelphia: Lippincott-RavenPublishers.

8. Shaffer LG, Tommerup N. (Eds) ISCN (2016) An International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature. S.Karger, Basel; 2016.

9. Standards and Guidelines for Clinical Genetics Laboratories. In. UNITED STATES; 2003.

10. Hsu LY, Benn PA. Revised guidelines for the diagnosis of mosaicism in amniocytes. PrenatDiagn. 1999 Disponible en:https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199911)19:11%3C1081::AID-PD682%3E3.0.CO;2-Z.

11. Penrose LS. The relative effects of paternal and maternal age in Mongolism. J Genet. 1933;27:219–224. [PubMed] Disponible en https://www.ias.ac.in/article/fulltext/jgen/088/01/0009-0014.

12.Yoon PW, Freeman SB, Sherman SL, Taft LF, Gu Y, petty D, Flanders WD, Khoury MJ, Hassold TJ. Advanced maternal age and the risk of Down syndrome characterized by meiotic stage of chromosomal error: a population-based study. Am J Hum Genet. 1996;58:628–633.Disponible en https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1914585/pdf/ajhg00016-0193.pdf.

13.Jason M. Franasiak M.D., Eric J. Forman M.D., Kathleen H. Hong M.D., The nature of aneuploidy with increasing age of the female partner: a review of 15,169 consecutive trophectoderm biopsies evaluated with comprehensive chromosomal screening .Fertility and Sterility, 2014( 101: (3), [656-663]. Disponible en: https://www.clinicalkey.es/service/content/pdf/watermarked/1-s2.0-S0015028213032573.pdf?locale=es_ES&searchIndex=

14.Bakker M, Pajkrt E, Bilardo C M. Increased nuchal translucency with normal karyotype and anomaly scan: What next? Best Practice & Research: Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology.28 (2014) 355–366. Disponible en: https://www.clinicalkey.es/service/content/pdf/watermarked/1-s2.0-S1521693413001570.pdf?locale=es_ES&searchIndex=

15.Durković J1, Ubavić M2, Durković M3, Kis T4. Prenatal Screening Markers for Down Syndrome: Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive and Negative Expected Value Method. J Med Biochem. 2018 Jan 1;37(1):62-66. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6294102/

16.Loane M , MorrisJK, Addor MC , Arriola L , Budd J , Doray B. Eur J Hum Genet. [Internet]. Twenty-year trends in the prevalence of Down syndrome and other trisomies in Europe: impact of maternal age and prenatal screening.2013 .21(1): [27–33]. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3522199/

17.Young Joo Kim, JeeEun Lee, Soo Hyun Kim, Sung Shin Shim, and Dong Hyun Cha. Maternal age-specific rates of fetal chromosomal abnormalities in Korean pregnant women of advanced maternal age.ObstetGynecol Sci. 2013 May; 56(3): 160–166. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1914585/pdf/ajhg00016-0193.pdf

18. Houlihan O A , O’Donoghue K .BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2013, 13:209 The natural history of pregnancies with a diagnosis of Trisomy 18 or Trisomy 13; a retrospective case series Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3840564/pdf/1471-2393-13-209.pdf

19. Hultén MA , D Patel S , Tankimanova M , Westgren M , Papadogiannakis N, Jonsson AM .On the origin of trisomy 21 Down syndrome. Molecular Cytogenetics.2008. Disponible en: https://molecularcytogenetics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1755-8166-1-21 .

20..Am J Hum Genet 32:477 -483, 1980 Evidence for Genetic Control of Nondisjunction in Man OMAR S. ALFII, RHUHNG,2 AND STANLEY P. AZEN2. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1686121/pdf/ajhg00190-0003.pdf

21.Brown AS1, Feingold E, Broman KW, Sherman SL. Genome-wide variation in recombination in female meiosis: a risk factor for non-disjunction

Published

2022-04-12

How to Cite

1.
Gómez DG, Rosado LAM, Barrios Martínez A, Soriano Torres M, Torriani Mendoza P, Castelví López A, et al. Maternal age risk factor on fetal prenatal diagnosis. revgencom [Internet]. 2022 Apr. 12 [cited 2025 May 25];13(2). Available from: https://revgenetica.sld.cu/index.php/gen/article/view/84

Issue

Section

Artículos originales